The Supreme Court Rules on the Affordable Care Act: What It Could Mean for Insurers
The Supreme Court’s five-to-four ruling that the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate provision is constitutional because it is a tax is having many immediate consequences. It surprised many observers, positioned Chief Justice John Roberts as one of the most influential Chief Justices in history, gave President Obama a victory, and inspired Mitt Romney and other Republicans to declare they would overturn the legislation. But what will be the long-term impact? Here are opinions, reactions and predictions related to the ruling and its potential effects on the insurance industry.
June 29, 2012
By
Kathy Burger
1. The Individual Mandate Is a (Legal) Tax
"It is reasonable to construe what Congress has done as increasing taxes on those who have a certain amount of income but choose to go without health insurance … The federal government does not have the power to order people to buy health insurance. ... The federal government does have the power to impose a tax on those without health insurance.
— Chief Justice John Roberts, who wrote the majority opinion in the Court's ruling on National Federation of Independent Business et al v. Sebelius.














