News & Commentary

01:20 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
Facebook
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

The Future of Auto Insurance — A Reply

"On-board" technologies are not the only ones insurers need to consider as having the potential to reduce auto premium, insists Celent's Donald Light.

Donald Light
Donald Light, Celent
In "The Reshaping of Auto Insurance," published earlier this week at I&T, the authors disputed what they characterized as "doomsday predictions" about drops in auto insurance premium. It's hard to avoid the conclusion that they had in mind the May 2012 report "A Scenario: The End of Auto Insurance. What Happens When There Are Almost No Accidents," by Donald Light, director of Celent's Americas property/casualty practice. Whatever the case, Light has shared with I&T some relevant counterpoints.

[For I&T's original take on Celent's study, see Prepare for Deep Auto Insurance Premium Drop Scenario, Celent Report Advises.]

The authors of the "The Reshaping of Auto Insurance," Marik Brockman and Anand Rao of PwC, insisted that despite the emergence of telematics and other technologies, such as automatic braking, location awareness, vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications, improved stability control for large commercial vehicles, and driverless cars, the auto insurance business would continue more or less as normal for the foreseeable future. Several of these technologies have been around for some time, and premium has held steady, they noted. Furthermore, they wrote:

While telematics have the potential to reduce premiums for some drivers – early adopters in particular are likely to be less risky customers and receive the greatest discounts – they actually may help the industry price policies more effectively overall.

Moreover, a series of cost factors and adoption resistance will continue to buoy premiums: high repair costs for increasingly complex vehicles, increasing medical costs for injuries, more frequent and devastating natural disasters, consumer advocates resisting potential privacy risks, and electronic malfunctions that fail to reduce accidents. Moreover, customers take time to adopt new technologies as they evolve due to lack of total understanding, high purchase costs, or the natural inertia of wanting to fully utilize durable products for much of their lengthy lifecycle. In fact, the age of American cars and trucks on the road has reached a record high of 10.8 years.

Both the PwC authors and Light acknowledge the possibility of significant auto premium decrease of some degree at some time in the future. Light faults the PwC report for considering only "on-board" technologies. "By doing so, it ignores the potential impact of automated traffic law enforcement — e.g. speeding and red light cameras," Light observes. "Depending on the political will — and desire for revenue — of state and local governments, these technologies may have a quicker and more dramatic impact than onboard technologies."

Governments could also mandate V2V communications as a way of increasing the carry capacity of roadways and avoiding costly construction. They might push adoption by characterizing V2V as a "green" technology with positive environmental effects.

Light implies that the concept of "risk shifting" featured in the PwC piece may support his contentions about the possibility of lower premiums. "If and when liability for many accidents shifts to the manufacturers of the automobiles — and/or the on-board equipment— it is likely that the frequency of accidents will be significantly lower, leading to lower losses, and lower premiums for auto insurers," he comments. "So change is coming for auto insurers in terms of business and operating models. The big question is how quickly."

[For the full text of the PwC-authored article, see The Reshaping of Auto Insurance.]

Anthony O'Donnell has covered technology in the insurance industry since 2000, when he joined the editorial staff of Insurance & Technology. As an editor and reporter for I&T and the InformationWeek Financial Services of TechWeb he has written on all areas of information ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
JCA.SGC
50%
50%
JCA.SGC,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/10/2013 | 8:32:36 PM
re: The Future of Auto Insurance — A Reply
For all authors I wonder if they are neglecting to talk to behavioral changes in driving - as the result of a constant monitor of their habits. Early anecdotal evidence suggests that there is an early indication where the drivers are consciously and consistently connecting driving practice to cost. I think that is worth mentioning. That being said, rates are still tied to aggregates losses and if best drivers find greater reduction, then less cautious pay more.-
KBurger
50%
50%
KBurger,
User Rank: Author
1/10/2013 | 6:58:48 PM
re: The Future of Auto Insurance — A Reply
Really interesting. Now we need to hear what auto insurance carriers think of all this and how it is shaping (or not shaping) their strategies.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This is a secure windows pc.
Current Issue
Security Operations and IT Operations: Finding the Path to Collaboration
A wide gulf has emerged between SOC and NOC teams that's keeping both of them from assuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of IT systems. Here's how experts think it should be bridged.
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
In past years, security researchers have discovered ways to hack cars, medical devices, automated teller machines, and many other targets. Dark Reading Executive Editor Kelly Jackson Higgins hosts researcher Samy Kamkar and Levi Gundert, vice president of threat intelligence at Recorded Future, to discuss some of 2016's most unusual and creative hacks by white hats, and what these new vulnerabilities might mean for the coming year.